« Yesterday In French History, I | Main | Franco-Phonies »
April 22, 2004
Banned for criticizing France

Well, in my guise as "Shralp" on an international message board, I've managed to get myself banned. Apparently the moderators there think that it's uncool to call people "Saddam supporters" for the mere fact that they scammed millions of dollars off of the oil-for-food program with Saddam's help.

That should make the German (Ragusa) and French (Lady Luthein) posters very happy.

I encourage you all to sign up (free) on those boards and post your opinion of French "diplomacy" in the thread.

posted by Jamie at 12:45 PM
Comments


Doesn't US law guarantees someone's innocence until proven guilty?

Posted by: zoomerx on April 22, 2004 02:32 PM

wow I guess we need to take the world court to the world court. Maybe Jacques Verges can be the advocate for the UN.

Posted by: Papertiger on April 22, 2004 03:17 PM

I'm told Total has already hired Johnny Cochran.

Posted by: zoomerx on April 22, 2004 07:51 PM

Are you kidding?

Did you read all the "rules for posting"?

NO CAPS. Not more than 3 Punctuation marks!!!!!!!!

The no CAPS would get me banned.
I'll stick with e-nough and Pave, where I can use CAPS AND ALL THE !!!! I WANT, thank you.

Posted by: andy on April 22, 2004 08:14 PM

Jamie,

I made a New Years resolution that I would never post to a blog where I had to go through a registration process. Right Wing News was a big give up, but it saves me headaches, and its the only resolution I've been able to keep.

Posted by: Papertiger on April 22, 2004 11:15 PM

Yes, I like to use caps.

See, look at this statement:
Oil for Fraud.

Now look.
OIL FOR FRAUD!!!

See the difference, frogs?

Posted by: andy on April 23, 2004 06:03 AM

Imminent Danger!

IMMINENT DANGER!

Hey, it works!

Posted by: zoomerx on April 23, 2004 09:50 PM

Mission accomplished

MISSION ACCOMPLISHED

ah ouais

Posted by: Max on April 24, 2004 06:18 AM

Zoomer,
Show me where the pres said Immenent Danger. I want to see the quote please.

Max,
For the aircraft carrier, the mission was accomplished. But if hanging a sign that could be misinterpreted by the willfully stupid is equal to stealing billions of dollars from a program intended to alleviate the suffering of millions is the same in the French mind. Well, that explains why France has fallen so far so fast, and we stupid idealistic Americans who actually do believe in Liberty, just get richer and stronger with each passing year.

Posted by: De-programmer on April 24, 2004 07:19 PM

De-programmer,

First, there are no charges yet. But are you insinuating that the French government is an accomplice if French companies are found guilty? Speaking of money scandals, it's amazing how Hallibuton has wasted no time in making a buck on the back of your own military...
http://www.cnn.com/2003/WORLD/meast/12/11/sprj.irq.halliburton/

Posted by: zoomerx on April 25, 2004 06:36 PM

1) It wasn't Halliburton, it was their subsidiary KBR.

2) They didn't make a buck. They overpaid for gas and passed the cost along.

But don't let anything so trivial as facts impede you.

Posted by: Doug on April 26, 2004 10:22 AM

Case dismissed!

Posted by: zoomerx on April 26, 2004 02:52 PM

"First, there are no charges yet. But are you insinuating that the French government is an accomplice if French companies are found guilty?"

I am not insinuating it, I am saying it. I am saying it because that is where the evidence seems to point. Chirac's cronies are on the famous list. The documents are from Saddams own oil ministry. They seem far too extensive to be forgeries. They are being investigated by the accounting firm that chased down so much stolen Nazi wealth to the Swiss.

Posted by: Drive-By on April 26, 2004 03:17 PM

"They didn't make a buck. They overpaid for gas and passed the cost along."

Actually, this is pretty similar to what the "coalition of the bribed", to use Kerry's phrase, if not as he intended it, did. The difference being of course that those responsible for oversight found it quickly.

Posted by: Drive-By on April 26, 2004 03:20 PM

Once again, the pro-terrorist gov't of France is trying to hide track in their attempts to destroy their perceived enemies, this time via the Oil-for-Scam scam.

When will the rest of us wake up and realize this?

Posted by: Pro-Freedom on April 26, 2004 07:43 PM

Oil for food program is a scandal at the UN level. Companies getting money from it were from US as well (Halliburton by instance was a subcontractor of Total).

You can critisize French policy if you please regarding its non participation in the iraq mess but the oil for food program is hardly a French thing.

Posted by: pavlin on April 27, 2004 03:44 PM

I didn't read any companies names on the Food for oil scam. I saw plenty of political orgs Communist parties and socialist parties of russia, but the most benifactors of Saddams bribes were individuals.

Posted by: Papertiger on April 27, 2004 03:58 PM

Here is a good article from today's NY Post:

HOW TO BUY A FRENCH VETO


Here's another:
French could match American obesity levels by 2020: study

Posted by: drive-by on April 28, 2004 09:42 AM

Great, something new to blame Americans for!

Posted by: zoomerx on April 29, 2004 12:07 AM

Here's another.

U.N. OIL PAPERS VANISH NY Post

Quelle Surprise! Corrupion? Here? Nonsense.

Well Polliwogs, you can't say you didn't hear about Timmerman here first.

Posted by: de-programmer on April 29, 2004 01:53 PM

I could never figure out at the time why France Russia and Germany wanted to keep the sanctions on, and the Oil for Food program going even after Saddam fell. Now it makes sense.

Posted by: de-programmer on April 29, 2004 01:56 PM

I love this line from the NY Post article linked above:
“Now it appears that Secretary-General Kofi Annan's sanctimonious posturing may have concealed oil bribes which reached high up in the ranks of the U.N. organization itself.”

So let's, look at two quotes from Annan that appeared in today’s Washington Times newspaper.

1.) “Meeting with reporters in NY…Annan lashed out at what he called “outrageous and exaggerated” press reporting.” This was AFTER the UN auditors refused to release “internal audits” of the Oil for FRAUD program to the GAO (US General Accounting Office) investigators probing the scandal yesterday.

2.) “Violent military action by an occupying power against inhabitants of an occupied country will only make matters worse.” Gee, guess what side he’s on….and now we know why.

Posted by: andy on April 29, 2004 08:28 PM

"(Halliburton by instance was a subcontractor of Total"

That's the first thing I have ever seen any of you polliwogs write that puts a glove on Halliburton. Not much of one though. Desperate. Face it, Chirac has destroyed the UN. Even the Canadians think so. How pathetic for you is that?

WASHINGTON -- With yesterday's landmark speech, Paul Martin tacitly acknowledged what Canada's foreign policy establishment has refused to accept for decades: that the United Nations is a failure, for which there is no solution.

Toronto Globe and Mail

Posted by: de-programmer on April 30, 2004 04:48 PM

Chirac has destroyed the UN

Well of course de-programmer. And the US might as well take advantage of the situation ...

Posted by: zoomerx on April 30, 2004 11:11 PM

Situation?

Posted by: Doug on May 2, 2004 05:49 PM

Is it all that surprising that Eurotrash would seek revenge if anyone said anything bad about the French? The French are genetic mistakes. Proof that God has a sense of humor. Those who support the French are merely too dim to share that joke.

Posted by: weaselteeth on May 19, 2004 07:51 PM
Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:


Remember info?