« Jack Knows Best | Main | Pave Improvements »
February 08, 2005
Those French Who Want To Save The American People

It's been a while since I last posted - more than a year actually-, mostly due to a lack of time.

I have been trying to post the exact same interview I have posted on another blog, but for some reason - maybe the size of the post, maybe the words of the interviewee-, it's just not going through correctly.

The editor of the new French publication 'L'anti-américain (primaire)' has agreed to answer to some questions. So, I invite all of you to go check the post here.

Here's a excerpt:

...as you must certainly have noted, l'AA(p) is not at all an anti-American newspaper (otherwise, no United-Statian collaborator would take part in it!) but of course an anti-Bush and anti-Bush voters newspaper. Which, according to the number of voters in the United States, only represents a small part of the population of this country (comforting, isn't it?). Quite the opposite, we are actually pro-American, and we would like to contribute to saving this people - that we admire in many respects - from the political, economic, media and religious regime that got its greedy hands on it...

Looks like time has come to go back to paving France.

posted by Carine at 05:24 AM
Comments


Come on guy, where is your humour ?

The magazine is very funny ! I gave a good laugh.

Posted by: Marcel on February 8, 2005 07:28 PM

Then I suppose drawn cartoons of the pútain French government accepting payments from the mullah terrorists in Iran to look the other way are comedic material as well, right?

Posted by: Pro-Freedom on February 8, 2005 10:41 PM

"represents a small part of the population of this country (comforting, isn't it?). "

To this crowd, it is always more important that a thought be comforting than truthful.

Posted by: brb on February 9, 2005 08:04 AM

It gives we a warm fuzzy feeling to know the French wish to save me from myself. Just look at how well things have worked out for Germany after France began to give them enlightened guidance. Only 5 million out of work and a welfare system to die for. On second thought that warm fuzzy feeling is probably the funny smelling pork-roast I warmed up for lunch.

Posted by: Sasquach on February 9, 2005 02:06 PM

What? A humouristic anti-American rag? Outrageous! I wonder why no such publication existed just a few years back.

Posted by: zoomerx on February 10, 2005 12:56 AM

Then I suppose drawn cartoons of the pútain French government accepting payments from the mullah terrorists in Iran to look the other way are comedic material as well, right?


Do you have a link "pro-freedom" or is this just one more "comedic" accusation on your part?

Posted by: zoomerx on February 10, 2005 12:59 AM

Do you have a link "pro-freedom" or is this just one more "comedic" accusation on your part?


Why didn't zoomerx request a link for the Anti Americain? {pick any page}

Posted by: Papertiger on February 10, 2005 06:08 AM

My humor died in Cote d Ivorie, Marcel.

{How filling that your named after a clown}

Posted by: Papertiger on February 10, 2005 06:11 AM

You are the clown, papertiger. You obviously know nothing about the timeline of the events leading to your Marxist, ethnic cleaner friend's self-destruction and now self-inflicted isolation, courtersy of the UN (yes, that includes the US).

Posted by: zoomerx on February 10, 2005 03:30 PM

My humor died in Cote d Ivorie, Marcel.

Yep. Killing innocent people is a shame, isn't it papertiger? How many innocent Irakis did you kill? (like one of your generals in Irak once said, "We don't do body counts", or another one just back from Afghanistan recently: "It's fun to shoot people").

The hypocrisy.

Posted by: zoomerx on February 10, 2005 03:54 PM

A lot less than the ones you starved to death. At least you guys got some oil vouchers out of it.

The Hypocrisy


"It's fun to shoot people" -
Oh that evil General, wanting to kill al qaeda and taliban members......such a bad man.

Posted by: Scaper on February 10, 2005 06:29 PM

Jesus H on a pogo stick. Idiot blames the US as part of the UN when it doesn't do something. He then blames the US when UN resolutions get enforced by US actions.

You obviously know nothing about the timeline of the events leading to your Marxist, ethnic cleaner friend's self-destruction and now self-inflicted isolation, courtersy of the UN (yes, that includes the US).

Zoomer "it's fun to shoot people" Idiot how about some context. The actual quote is: ""You go into Afghanistan, you got guys who slap women around for five years because they didn't wear a veil. You know, guys like that ain't got no manhood left anyway. So it's a hell of a lot of fun to shoot them.""

Posted by: cannon on February 10, 2005 07:53 PM

I don't care who you're shooting, cannon, you don't brag about it like a 5 year old.

Posted by: zoomerx on February 11, 2005 01:36 AM

Unless of course who you are shooting happens to be some Ivory Coast citizens in which case it's perfect justified.

Posted by: cannon on February 11, 2005 08:26 AM

Forget about how many people that the French starved by corrupting the Oil for Food program. Look at the larger picture. France, Germany, and Russia discredited sanctions as an alternative to war. They discredited the UN. What a world leader Chirac has been.

Posted by: brb on February 11, 2005 12:51 PM

Forget about how many people that the French starved by corrupting the Oil for Food program. Look at the larger picture

"The French"? Only twelve French companies out of over a hundred international companies are on an inquisition list (which includes US individuals, by the way), so far, a drop in the bucket (and I'm all for prosecuting those guilty). Of course what you may not know is that the bulk of the scandal involves the illegal export of oil to "friendly" Middle Estern countries, but pointing the finger at "the French" is sooo much more convenient, isn't it?

Posted by: zoomerx on February 12, 2005 12:53 AM
Only twelve French companies out of over a hundred international companies are on an inquisition list (which includes US individuals, by the way), so far, a drop in the bucket (and I'm all for prosecuting those guilty).

Really Idiot? US individuals were involved?!? Nah... can't be... Oh wait a minute... Maybe that's why this has already happened (scroll down a bit, 5th story)

WASHINGTON -- An Iraqi-American businessman, accused of pocketing millions of dollars through the U.N. oil-for-food program with Iraq, pleaded guilty Tuesday to acting as an illegal agent of Saddam Hussein's government.

Samir A. Vincent, 64, a naturalized U.S. citizen from Annandale, Va., is the first person to be charged in the Justice Department's investigation of the program, which U.N. audits have shown was badly mismanaged. The United Nations operated the program from 1996 to 2003 as a way for Iraq's oil riches to benefit its people, who were suffering from years of deprivation brought on by economic sanctions imposed on Saddam's regime following its 1990 invasion of Kuwait.

We have already started to clean house. What have you frogs done besides demand that the sanctions continue back in 2003?

Posted by: cannon on February 12, 2005 12:13 PM

We have already started to clean house.

Oh really? Is that why Volcker said that many individuals in the US are "dragging their feet", because of ahem... US "protection" laws? btw, is that an admission of guilt?

What have you frogs done besides demand that the sanctions continue back in 2003?

According to Volcker, "fully participated" in the investigation, unlike Russia. Must be tough for you that the main target has now shifted to Annan...


Posted by: zoomerx on February 12, 2005 07:44 PM

Not at all Idiot, unlike your blind hatred of America, we are willing to take care of more than one issue at a time.

Posted by: cannon on February 13, 2005 11:28 AM

Hello !

As in Irak ,in Ireland """courageous"" Brit's troops attack -first- disarmed peoples !
Then Irishmen take again the struggle against those war's criminals !
Brits criminals troops !! Out of Ireland !
Free Ireland !!
Brits criminals ! Stop racism and colonialism against Catholics in Ireland !!
Halt to the domination of this ridiculous royauty with his "queen" Parker-Bowles !!!
Vive la Répulique libre d'Irlande !!!

Posted by: AntiBrits on February 13, 2005 01:13 PM

See how clever my "fellow" citizens are... So far so good! AntiBrits, are you talking about the disarmed IRA buying tons of explosives with the British sate welfare?

Or maybe you talk about what the British did several centuries ago, when France was a so peaceful and non colonizing country...
But you forgot to mention an other member of the Coalition which freed Irak, Italy: you forgot to compare Italian troops in Irak with Roman legions burning the known world two thousand years ago! Not the same thing?
And what about Poland who expelled Germans after WW2 from the south-east of Poland? Huh? Not the same thing?
And British, who leaded a colonial war against the Americans 2 centuries ago... No, that's not a good example... And Americans who nuked Japan?! Oh, wait, that doesn't match, Japan is also part of the Coalition... Let me see... Yes: and Japanese, who made such horrid things to Chinese? huh? Ain't that the same thing?

--------------------------------------------------------

Voyez comme ils sont, mes con-patriotes... Un régal ! AntiBrits, vous parlez des partisans désarmés de l'IRA qui achètent des tonnes de bombes avec les aides d'état, de l'état Britanique ?

Ou alors vous parlez de ce qu'ont fait les Britanniques il y a quelques siècles, à une époque où la France était un pays si pacifique et pas colonisateur pour un sou...
Mais vous avez oublié de mentionner un autre membre de la Coallition qui a libéré l'Irak, l'Italie : vous avez oublié de comparer les troupes italiennes en Irak avec les légion romaines qui ont mis à feu et à sang le monde connu il y a deux mille ans ! Hein, c'est pas pareil ?
Et rien non plus sur la Pologne qui a expulsé des milliers d'Allemands de Silésie après la 2nde guerre mondiale ? Non, c'est pas la même chose ?
Et ces Britanniques qui ont mené une guerre coloniale contre les Américains il y a 2 siècles... Non, ce n'et pas un bon exemple... Et ces Américains qui ont largué des bombes atomiques sur le Japon ?! Oh, euh, non, le Japon fait aussi partie de la Coallition... Un petit instant... Oui : et les Japonnais, qui ont fait de telles exactions sur les Chinois ? Hein ? C'est pas la même chose ça peut-être ?

Posted by: ashamed-frenchman on February 13, 2005 03:27 PM

Cher ashamed-frenchman,

Pour votre gouverne historique,l'empire romain a cessé d'exister en 476...Les Pâques sanglantes c'était en 1916...
On sent en vous le parfait petit-aligné du libéralisme.Enfin.. la collaboration est de tous les temps...
Je dis que quand on prétend incarner la Démocratie Universelle,on doit faire cesser l'entreprise criminelle de colonisation de l'Irlande (des siécles de meurtres de Cromwell à votre (sans-doute) chère Thatcher)).Surtout que l'allié américain,(dont vous êtes sans doute aussi un admirateur) ,dans son hypocrisie de meurtrier-colonisateur de 30 millions d'Indiens- a toujours professé le mépris du colonialisme...

Posted by: Antibrits on February 13, 2005 03:57 PM

Collabo ? Sans blague ? de la part d'un franchouille qui est sans doute allé brailler dans la rue son soutien indéfectible à Saddam ?!
Et pour le coup du "meurtrier-colonisateur de 30 millions d'Indiens", tu te trompes : les Américains ont tué 30 milliards d'indiens, bien sûr, va voir ceci et cela. Amène une seule preuve de ce que tu avances - ahem, évite juste de ramener Howard Zinn et son histoire révisionniste de l'Amérique...
Et il y a quelque chose sur lequel il faut que je sois clair : je n'ai jamais nié les exactions des Britanniques sur les Iralandais. C'est ta comparaison débile et pathétique avec l'Irak qui me fait réagir. Les Britanniques, avec les USA et leurs alliés de la Coallition, ont libéré l'Irak, que tu le veuilles ou non.
--------------------------------------------
Collaborationnist? No kidding? From a Weasel who was surely whining in the streets in demonstrations of unswerving support to Saddam?!
And for the "murderer-colonizer of over 30 million Indians", you're wrong: Americans killed 30 billion Indians, of course, go and check this and that. Bring just a little proof of what you say - ahem, please avoid Howard Zinn's revisionist history of America's history...
And something has to be clear: I never denied British exactions on the Irish. It's your weird and pathetic comparison with Irak that makes me react. British, with the Americans and their allies of the Coalition, have freed Irak, whenever you admit it or not.

Posted by: ashamed-frenchman on February 13, 2005 06:05 PM

So, some dumb Frenchie wants to save me from myself. Sounds about like a whore saving a nun from a life of vice to me.

Posted by: kschlenker on February 13, 2005 06:39 PM

Cher Ashamed,

Vous reconnaissez les crimes des bon libéraux brits en Irlande.C'est un début...
D'ailleurs vous illustrez ainsi parfaitement la démarche anglo-saxonne que Chomsky a mis admirablement en lumière.
Etape 1):
le criminel (américain ou Brits) commet des crimes innomables sous couvert du Droit Naturel hayekien.

Etape 2):
20 ,30 ans ou 400 après (400 ans c'est votre cas pour l'Irlande),le criminel reconnait ses crimes.Et bien sûr,il dit "j'ai changé.Je ne recommencerai plus".

Etape 3):
Il replonge dans une série de nouveaux crimes qu'il nie sur l'instant (c'est votre cas pour l'Irak).
Il n'y a pas d'autres civilisations que l'anglo-saxonne qui a -à ma connaissance- ce mode de fonctionnement.Je pense que c'est une conséquence du protestantisme.

PS:Si vous êtes si sûr d'avoir apporté la démocratie à l'Irak,alors vous ne verrez pas d'inconvénients à me donner le bilan des victimes civiles et militaires irakiennes de votre "bienfaisante" action.Je trouve les partisans de la Démocratie Universelle -si soucieux du Droit Naturel- bien silencieux sur ce point.
Enfin puisque vous admettez le crime irlandais,les chiffres de ce génocide venant de votre part m'intêresseraient beaucoup..

Posted by: AntiBrits on February 14, 2005 07:25 AM

Cher Ashamed,
Vous reconnaissez les crimes des bon libéraux brits en Irlande.C'est un début...
What's your problem with liberalism moron? Don't you know you're typing on a keyboard saying your fascist propaganda because libéraux (I use the french word to avoid confusion with American meaning of "liberal") allowed you to do so, by creating things such as Individual Rights and eaquality under the Law!? And do you think all the British are and have always been libéraux?!

D'ailleurs vous illustrez ainsi parfaitement la démarche anglo-saxonne que Chomsky a mis admirablement en lumière.
Here we are! Noam Chomsky, the "philosopher" of self hatred, who in the very same page of his personal Mein Kampf named Understanding Power strongly and passionately defends revisionist "historians" like Howard Zinn, Ernst Zundel, and even Robert Faurisson...
Now what little fascist, will you lecture me with other "great writers", such as David Irving or Ward Churchill?

Etape 1):
le criminel (américain ou Brits) commet des crimes innomables sous couvert du Droit Naturel hayekien.

Do you just know who is Freidrich A. Hayek, and did you only read one his books?
The way you write your phrase is just relevant: you write "Le criminel (américain ou Brits)", like your fellow fascists used to say "the Jew looter".

Etape 2):
20 ,30 ans ou 400 après (400 ans c'est votre cas pour l'Irlande),le criminel reconnait ses crimes.Et bien sûr,il dit "j'ai changé.Je ne recommencerai plus".

Oh really? The murderer lives 400 years, longer than a real murderer like Arafat or Stalin... And why didn't you answer about how your glorious country France behaved in the very same times?

Etape 3):
Il replonge dans une série de nouveaux crimes qu'il nie sur l'instant (c'est votre cas pour l'Irak).
Il n'y a pas d'autres civilisations que l'anglo-saxonne qui a -à ma connaissance- ce mode de fonctionnement.Je pense que c'est une conséquence du protestantisme.

Oh, I see: freeing Irak is a crime... Dumbass collaborationnist! Who do you think you will convince, Irakis?

PS:Si vous êtes si sûr d'avoir apporté la démocratie à l'Irak,alors vous ne verrez pas d'inconvénients à me donner le bilan des victimes civiles et militaires irakiennes de votre "bienfaisante" action.Je trouve les partisans de la Démocratie Universelle -si soucieux du Droit Naturel- bien silencieux sur ce point.
About 10 000, no accurate number.

Enfin puisque vous admettez le crime irlandais,les chiffres de ce génocide venant de votre part m'intêresseraient beaucoup...
Hey my little revisionist, you want me to bring numbers about something that happened 400 years ago, as it's impossible to get accurate ones concerning WW2 or more recently Iraki Freedom? Do you have those concerning Irak-Iran war, or the genocide Saddam made on Kurds?


Posted by: ashamed-frenchman on February 19, 2005 06:12 AM
Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:


Remember info?